/
Bharat Summit visa row: 115 of 315 cleared speakers denied entry, Tharoor says
Shashi Tharoor says 115 of 315 MEA-cleared Bharat Summit speakers were denied entry or lost visas. The MEA called visa decisions sovereign on 13 November, and Rahul Gandhi apologised to absent delegates.
P
3 min
Congress MP Shashi Tharoor has alleged that 115 of the 315 speakers cleared by the Ministry of External Affairs for the Bharat Summit in Hyderabad were refused entry to India or had their visas cancelled. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) responded on Friday 13 November, calling visa decisions a sovereign matter. On Saturday 14 November, the final day of the summit, Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi apologised to the foreign delegates who could not attend.
Tharoor made the claim in statements shared on social media. He and the event's organisers said the last-minute refusals and cancellations were carried out "apparently on the instructions of the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA)". The MHA had not been quoted in response in the material available at the time of writing.
The figure is not uniform across accounts. One report on the row put the number of foreign delegates turned away at 113, a count that differs slightly from Tharoor's 115.
Asked about the claim that 115 of 315 approved speakers had failed to secure visas, the MEA's Jaiswal said visa-related decisions were a matter of sovereignty. The ministry described them as "sovereign functions" of every government, and defended India's position without addressing the individual cases.
The exchange sets the MEA's own clearance against the allegation that another arm of the government overrode it. Tharoor's account is that the delegates had already been approved by the MEA before the home ministry stepped in. The MEA's statement, as reported from its Friday briefing, did not confirm or deny that sequence.
For the speakers affected, the practical result was the same whichever department acted. Some were stopped at the border after being cleared, and others saw visas revoked before they could travel.
Rahul Gandhi's apology to absent delegates
Speaking during the summit, Gandhi apologised publicly to the foreign guests who were kept away. He said the episode reflected the kind of operational constraints that he and his party routinely encounter, treating it as an illustration of how the Centre deals with its opponents.
The remark gave the dispute a sharper political edge. The summit was organised by the Congress-led Telangana government, which put a state run by the opposition at odds with the Union government over who is allowed to attend an international event on Indian soil.
Timing compounded the problem. The restrictions surfaced, or took effect, as the multi-day conference moved toward its close on 14 November. Critics noted that reversing the decisions in time for the speakers to join was practically impossible.
This was the second edition of the Bharat Summit. It was designed to bring together politicians, think tanks, researchers, journalists and academics from around the world, with the stated aim of fostering dialogue between the Global South and the Global North.
An event with that purpose depends on its international speakers being in the room. If the allegation is accurate, more than a third of the approved speaker list never reached Hyderabad. The figure of 115 out of 315 works out at roughly 36.5 per cent.
Reports on the row have named at least one affected speaker, a Norwegian journalist, Helle Lyng Svendsen, though the material available does not set out the details of her case.
What remains unresolved
The core disagreement is over who made the decisions and why. Tharoor and the organisers point to the MHA. The MEA has framed the matter in general terms, saying every government exercises sovereign authority over visas, and has not given reasons for any specific refusal or cancellation.
Nothing in the material indicates that any of the affected delegates will be offered a fresh visa process, or that the MHA will issue its own explanation. With the summit ending on Saturday, any further clarification would come after the event, and the dispute is now being carried in the national political debate rather than on the conference floor.
About the Author
P
Prateek Rawat
Staff Writer
Prateek Rawat is a contributor to Wirony. All articles published under this byline undergo editorial review and approval before publication, with any necessary corrections handled…
P
3 min
What did you think?
